
 Friday, April 28, 1972

Text of Nixon Talk to Nation on Viet War
WASHINGTON (UPI) --Text of President Nixon's address to the
nation Wednesday night:
 During the past three
weeks you have been reading and hearing about the massive invasion of South
Vietnam by the Communist armies of North Vietnam.
Tonight, I want to
give you a first hand report on the military situation in Vietnam, the decisions
I have made with regard to the role of the United States forces in the conflict,
and the efforts we are making to bring peace at the negotiating table.
Let me begin by
briefly reviewing what the situation was when I took office, and what we have
done since then to end American involvement in the war and to bring peace to the
long-suffering people of Southeast Asia.
On January 20, 1969,
the American troop ceiling in Vietnam was 549,000. Our casualties were running
as high as 300 a week. Thirty thousand young Americans were being drafted every
month.
Today, 39 months
later, through our program of Vietnamization -helping the South Vietnamese
develop the capability of defending themselves-the number of Americans in
Vietnam by May 1st will have been reduced to 69,000. Our casualties -even
during the present, all-out enemy offensive-have been reduced by 95 per cent.
Draft calls now average fewer than 5,000 men a month, and we expect to bring
them to zero next year.
As I reported in my
television address to the Nation on January 25, we have offered the most
generous peace terms in both public and private negotiating sessions. Our most
recent proposal provided for an immediate ceasefire; the exchange of all
prisoners of war; the withdrawal of all forces within six months; and new
elections in Vietnam which would be internationally supervised, with all
political elements including the Communists participating in and helping to run
the elections. President Thieu and Vice President Huong would resign.
Hanoi's contemptuous
answer to this offer was a refusal even to discuss our proposals and, at the
same time, a massive escalation of their military activities on the battlefield.
Last October, the same month when we made this peace offer to Hanoi in secret,
our intelligence reports began to indicate that the enemy was building up for a
major attack. Yet we deliberately refrained from responding militarily.
Instead we patiently continued with the Paris talks, because we wanted to give
the enemy every chance to reach a negotiated settlement at the bargaining table
rather than to seek a military victory on the battlefield --a victory they
cannot be allowed to win.
Finally, three weeks
ago, on Easter weekend, they mounted their invasion of South Vietnam. Three
North Vietnamese divisions swept across the demilitarized zone into South
Vietnam -in violation of the treaties they had signed in 1954 and in violation
of the understanding they reached with President Johnson in 1968, when he
stopped the bombing in North Vietnam in return for arrangements which included
their pledge not to violate the DMZ. Shortly after the invasion across the DMZ,
another three North Vietnamese divisions invaded South Vietnam further south.
As the offensive progressed, the enemy indiscriminately shelled civilian
population centers in clear violation of the 1968 bombing halt understanding.
Finally, I have
ordered that our air and naval attacks on military installations in North
Vietnam be continued until the North Vietnamese stop their offensive in South
Vietnam.
I have flatly
rejected the proposal that we stop the bombing of North Vietnam as a condition
for returning to the negotiating table. They sold that package to the United
States once before, in 1968, and we are not going to buy it again in 1972.
Look at the record.
By July 1 we will have withdrawn over 90 per cent of our forces that were in
Vietnam in 1969. Before the enemy's invasion began, we had cut our air sorties
in half. We have offered exceedingly generous terms for peace. The only thing
that we have refused to do is accede to the enemy's demand to overthrow the
lawfully constituted government of South Vietnam and to impose a Communist
dictatorship in its place.
As you will recall, I
have warned on a number of occasions over the past three years that if the enemy
responded to our efforts to bring peace by stepping up the war I would act to
meet that attack, for three reasons: to protect our remaining American forces,
to permit continuation of our withdrawal program, and to prevent the imposition
of a Communist regime on the people of South Vietnam against their will, with
the inevitable bloodshed that would follow for hundreds of thousands who have
dared to oppose Communist aggression.
The air and naval
strikes of recent weeks have been carried out to achieve these objectives. They
have been directed only against military targets supporting the invasion of the
South. They will not stop until that invasion stops.
The Communists have
failed in their efforts to win over the people of South Vietnam politically.
General Abrams believes that they will fail in their efforts to conquer South
Vietnam militarily. Their one remaining hope is to win in the Congress of the
United States, and among the people of the United States, the victory they
cannot win among the people of South Vietnam or on the battlefield in South
Vietnam.
The great question is
how we, the American people, will respond to this final challenge.
Let us look at what
the stakes are ---not just for South Vietnam but for the United States and for
the cause of peace in the world. If one country, armed with the most modern
weapons by other countries, can invade another nation and succeed in conquering
it, other countries will be encouraged to do exactly the same thing ---in the
Mideast, in Europe, and in other international danger spots. If the Communists
win militarily in Vietnam, the risk of war in other parts of the world would be
enormously increased.
We aren't trying to
conquer North Vietnam or any other country. We want no territory. We seek no
bases. We have offered the most generous peace terms -peace with honor for both
sides -with South Vietnam and North Vietnam each respecting the other's
independence.
But, we will not be
defeated; and we will never surrender our friends to Communist aggression.
We have come a long
way in this conflict. The South Vietnamese have made great progress and are now
bearing the brunt of the battle. We can now see the day when no more Americans
will be involved there at all.
The facts are clear.
More than 120,000 North Vietnamese are now fighting in the South. There are no
South Vietnamese troops anywhere in North Vietnam. Twelve of North Vietnam's
thirteen regular combat divisions have now left their own soil in order to carry
aggressive war into the territory of their neighbors. Whatever pretext there
was of a civil war in South Vietnam has now been stripped away.
What we are
witnessing here -what is being brutally inflicted upon the Republic of Vietnam
-is a clear case of naked and unprovoked aggression across an international
border. The only word for it is invasion.
This massive attack
has been resisted on the ground entirely by South Vietnamese forces. No United
States ground troops have been involved. To support this defensive effort by
the South Vietnamese I have ordered attacks on enemy military targets in both
North and South Vietnam by the air and naval forces of the United States.
I have before me a
report which I received this morning from General Abrams. He gives the following
evaluation of the situation:
1. The South
Vietnamese are fighting courageously and well in their self defense, and
inflicting very heavy casualties on the invading force, which has not gained the
easy victory some predicted for it three weeks ago.
2. Our air strikes
have been essential in protecting our own remaining forces and in assisting the
South Vietnamese in their efforts to protect their homes and their country from
a Communist takeover.
3. General Abrams
predicts that there will be several more weeks of very hard fighting in which
some battles will be lost and others will be won by the South Vietnamese. But
he is convinced that, if we continue to provide air and sea support, the enemy
will fail in its desperate gamble to impose a Communist regime on South Vietnam,
and that the South Vietnamese will then have demonstrated their ability to
defend themselves on the ground against future enemy attacks.
Based on this
realistic assessment from General Abrams, and after consultation with President
Thieu, Ambassador Bunker, Ambassador Porter, and my senior advisers in
Washington, I have three decisions to announce tonight.
First, I have decided
that Vietnamization has proved itself sufficiently that we can continue our
program of withdrawing American forces without detriment to our overall goal of
ensuring South Vietnam's survival as an independent country. Consequently, I am
announcing tonight that over the next two months 20,000 more Americans will be
brought home form Vietnam. This decision has the full approval of President
Thieu and of General Abrams. It will bring our troop ceiling down to 49,000 by
July 1 -a reduction of half a million men since this Administration came into
office.
Second, I have
directed Ambassador Porter to return to the negotiating table in Paris tomorrow,
but with one very specific purpose in mind. We are not resuming the Paris talks
simply in order to hear more empty propaganda and bombast from the North
Vietnamese and Viet Cong delegates, but to get on with the constructive business
of making peace. We are resuming the Paris talks with the firm expectation that
productive talks leading to rapid progress will follow through all available
channels. As far as we are concerned, the first order of business will be to
get the enemy to halt his invasion of South Vietnam, and to return the American
prisoners of war.
But as we come to the
end of this long and difficult struggle we must be steadfast. We must not
falter. For all that we have risked and all that we have gained over the years
now hangs in the balance during the coming weeks and months. If we now let down
our friends, we shall surely be letting down ourselves and our future as well.
If we now persist, history will thank America for her courage and her vision at
this testing time.
That is why I say let
us bring our men home from Vietnam. Let us end the war in Vietnam. But let us
end it in such a way that the younger brothers and sons of the brave men who
have fought in Vietnam will not have to fight again in some other Vietnam at
some time in the future.
Any man who sits here
in this office feels a solemn and heavy weight of obligation to future
generations. No man who sits here has the right to take any action which would
abdicate America's great tradition of world leadership.
Earlier this year I
traveled to Peking on an historic journey for peace. Next month I shall travel
to Moscow on what I hope will also be a journey for peace. In the eighteen
countries I have visited as President I have found great respect for the office
of President of the United States. I have reason to expect, based on Dr.
Kissinger's report, that I shall find the same respect for the Presidency when I
visit Moscow.
I do not know who will
be in this office in the years ahead. But I do know that future Presidents will
travel to nations abroad on journeys for peace as I have. If the United States
betrays the millions of people who have relied on us in Vietnam, the President
of the United States, whoever he is, will not deserve nor receive the respect
which is essential if the United States is to play the great role we are
destined to play of helping to build a new structure of peace in the world. It
would amount to a renunciation of our morality, an abdication of our leadership
among nations, and an invitation for the mighty to prey upon the weak all around
the world. It would be to deny peace the chance peace deserves to have. This
we shall never do.
Let us then unite as a
nation in a firm and wise policy of peace --not the peace of surrender, but
peace with honor --not only peace in our time, but peace for generations to
come.
Thank you, and good
night.
"Text of Nixon Talk to Nation on Viet War", by WASHINGTON (UPI),
published in the Pacific Stars and Stripes on Friday, April 28, 1972 and
reprinted with permission from European and Pacific Stars and Stripes, a
Department of Defense publication copyright, 2002 European and Pacific Stars and
Stripes. |